The anti-art movement is its definition and its philosophy, the anti-art movement and its most famous pioneers
We define the anti-art movement:
The anti-art movement is a response to the modernist artistic movement at the beginning of the 20th century, which distinguished itself by focusing on the process of creating art instead of its final product. This term was written by the American artist Glenn Brown in 1964, who estimated that the artists were under pressure to make a work very interested in beauty and form. He argued that these concerns are not only useless but also harm their creativity and therefore to society as a whole. The anti-art movement has propagated since all over the world, with many artists and criticisms who share similar concerns concerning the excessive reproduction of beauty in contemporary culture.
The anti-art movement is a movement in which artists and criticism try to dismantle the concept of art. The term "against" refers to the negative indication which was associated with the word "art" during the 19th century when it was associated with bourgeois ideas on beauty and culture. On the other hand, the art world today has become more open and diversified, with many different styles and types represented by thousands of artists from around the world. Consequently, some people believe that there is no longer a real need for an anti-art movement because there is no longer a single definition of what is "good" or "bad" art.
The roots of the movement are due to the romantic movement which sought to express feelings through art. However, with the passage of time and society has become more modern, the artists began to focus on the aesthetic characteristics of their work instead of its emotional influence on viewers. The anti-art movement seeks to restore the feelings of the world of fine arts by focusing on how to make us works of art that we feel instead of its form or what it depicts. This can be done thanks to a variety of methods, in particular:
Use unconventional materials such as paper instead of fabric or paint;
- Use unconventional environments such as clay or fabric;
- Use unconventional forms such as boxes or sculptures;
- Allow more personal interpretations of the images of history;
Pioneers of the anti-art movement:
The anti-art movement is a group of artists and designers who oppose the use of art as a form of communication. They believe in the need to use art to express feelings, experiences and emotions, rather than simply using it as an advertising tool. The anti-art movement is an increasing movement aimed at undermining the idea of art.
The most famous member of this movement is Marcel Doshamb, who invented a work of art entitled The Fountain (1917). He was an artist invented many other works during his life, but this work was more popular among other artists because he showed how the absurdity of people who believed that art could be the time. Marcel Doshamb. It was believed that art should be free from any type of community control or control.
It was formed by artists who were part of an existing artistic world, but they were frustrated with its borders and restrictions. The aim of the movement was to break these barriers so that artists can be creative freely without adhering to traditional ideas on the form that art or what can be achieved should appear. The idea behind this movement is simple: if you want to do something correctly, you should do it yourself.
The philosophy of the anti-art movement:
The anti-art movement is a group of people who believe that art should not be assessed as a form of expression. They believe that art is a tool used to manipulate and control people, and they do not want to be falsified or controlled. When the artists began to wonder if their works were used to obtain personal gains or they were made for art. The anti-art movement sought to break the barriers between artists and society by questioning the validity of what they did and if their work had any value which or not exceeds their arrogance.
The anti-art movement began in the 1960s when artists began to use their works as political tools instead of simple aesthetic ends. They started using their art to express their political convictions and make statements on society. This type of work has been considered "politically" because it questions traditional opinions on art, freedom of expression and other questions related to modern culture.
The anti-art movement has since been present; However, he recently gained popularity because people are interested in finding new ways to express themselves without being controlled by the idea of another person on what can be considered a functional description of the artist. ""
Find out more:
- The rules of Fine Art, the rules of training in the Fine Arts
- The basics of drawing from memory or imagination, drawing from memory or imagination
إرسال تعليق